Soda Tax - I am for it
Below is link to the Middletown Press letter I wrote supporting a tax on soda:
http://www.middletownpress.com/opinion/20170515/letter-soda-tax-could-help-ameliorate-growing-health-care-crisis
http://www.middletownpress.com/opinion/20170515/letter-soda-tax-could-help-ameliorate-growing-health-care-crisis
Rumor has it that there is resistance
to a tax on soft drinks due to it being seen as regressive, as poor
people buy the most soda, and would then pay the most tax. Of course,
if people replace drinking soda with drinking tap water they would
end up spending less and being healthier, too. Opposition to a soda
tax is a perverse form of advocacy for poor people. It is as much as
saying the tax is regressive, and diabetes is progressive, so let's
stay with diabetes.
The poor end up losing by maintaining
the status quo, as well as anyone else who is drinking more soda than
is healthy. It is really not a class issue. Soda is bad for human
beings. Would you feed it to your dog? No. Why is it OK to load up
your children on it?
Opposing attempts to reduce soda
consumption erodes confidence in these leaders on the whole issue of
taking on the epidemic of diabetes. Treatment of this condition is
expensive, so much so that the increased prevalence of diabetes
challenges our capacity to provide universal health coverage. Leaders
who ask money to be spent providing health coverage for lower income
people, while opposing a measure that would reduce these costs on the
basis that poor people should be allowed to continue getting sick, as
a sort of privilege, undermine the larger social compact.
There is a cost to society when people
choose to poison themselves. It is wise to start collecting the
premium on such self-destructive behavior before the bills come due,
especially if it guides people to avoid the tax, and the costs to
their health. Leaders should guide people to make better choices, or
stop pretending to be leaders.
Comments
Post a Comment